Which sportsbook has the best player prop odds?
There is no single answer, and pages that give one are wrong on half the board. On one night of our board across 19 books, bet365 and ProphetX tied for the best price most often overall, each on 31.3% of the rows they quoted. But it splits by sport: DraftKings was best on 93% of passing yards, 71% of rushing and 70% of receiving, while bet365 took 52% of walks, 37% of runs and 35% of singles. On home runs DraftKings was the best price on zero rows out of 147.
Every page ranking for this question names one book. On one night of our own board, a single winner is wrong on about half the markets, and wrong in a way that matters: the book that owns football props was the best price on none of the home run props it quoted.
What we counted
Our board for the 12 September 2026 slate, 19 books, 6,376 priced sides. A side is one book’s price on one player’s over or under at one number, so the over and the under of a single line are two rows. Those 6,376 sides sit on 3,498 distinct player lines, 5,168 rows of baseball and 1,208 of football.
We kept rows where at least three books were quoting, because a “best price” among two books is not line shopping. Then we counted, per row, which book had the highest decimal odds.
That is the whole method. No model, no projection and no fair value is involved in this ranking. It is a count of who was highest.
Overall, across every market
| Book | Rows quoted | Best price on | Share of the board quoted |
|---|---|---|---|
| bet365 | 3,532 | 31.3% | 55.4% |
| ProphetX | 3,353 | 31.3% | 52.6% |
| NoVig | 2,357 | 23.1% | 37.0% |
| betPARX | 1,686 | 22.6% | 26.4% |
| BetMGM | 4,331 | 21.8% | 67.9% |
| DraftKings | 4,977 | 21.8% | 78.1% |
| theScore Bet | 5,149 | 21.7% | 80.8% |
| BetOnline.ag | 1,724 | 17.3% | 27.0% |
| Hard Rock Bet (FL) | 786 | 14.6% | 12.3% |
| Polymarket | 185 | 13.0% | 2.9% |
| FanDuel | 1,613 | 12.9% | 25.3% |
| Fanatics | 1,510 | 10.9% | 23.7% |
| Hard Rock Bet | 5,033 | 10.5% | 78.9% |
| Bally Bet | 788 | 10.0% | 12.4% |
| Bovada | 2,095 | 6.3% | 32.9% |
| BetRivers | 1,238 | 4.2% | 19.4% |
| Caesars | 2,059 | 3.9% | 32.3% |
| Pinnacle | 865 | 3.5% | 13.6% |
| Fliff | 4,592 | 1.0% | 72.0% |
Two things in that table are worth more than the top line.
The top is a tie, and one half of it is not a sportsbook. bet365 and ProphetX both landed on 31.3%. ProphetX is a peer-to-peer exchange, where you are taking a price from another bettor rather than from a book, which is a large part of why it is up there. NoVig, third, works the same way. If you only want traditional sportsbooks, the ranking you actually want starts lower down the table.
Fliff priced almost three quarters of the board and was the best price on one row in a hundred. Breadth is not the same thing as price, and the book offering you the most things to bet on is not offering them at the best number.
The finding: it splits by sport
This is the part a single-winner page cannot say. These are the three books readers usually compare.
| Market | Rows | DraftKings | FanDuel | bet365 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing Yards | 99 | 93% (44) | 42% (26) | too few rows |
| Rushing Yards | 246 | 71% (118) | 37% (120) | too few rows |
| Receiving Yards | 478 | 70% (240) | 42% (250) | too few rows |
| Receptions | 327 | 27% (288) | 12% (288) | too few rows |
| Stolen Bases | 179 | 34% (164) | 5% (82) | 31% (143) |
| Walks | 561 | 37% (518) | too few rows | 52% (441) |
| Runs | 458 | 6% (456) | too few rows | 37% (310) |
| Singles | 539 | 20% (526) | too few rows | 35% (379) |
| Hits | 525 | 12% (482) | 1% (213) | 29% (366) |
| Total Bases | 640 | 3% (225) | 0% (124) | 29% (282) |
| Doubles | 513 | 23% (513) | too few rows | 28% (395) |
| Home Runs | 420 | 0% (147) | 0% (147) | 27% (338) |
| RBIs | 475 | 14% (464) | 0% (195) | 24% (326) |
| H+R+RBI | 581 | 9% (507) | too few rows | 23% (411) |
| Strikeouts | 88 | 6% (66) | 3% (64) | 16% (50) |
The bracketed figure is how many of that market’s rows the book quotes at all, and the percentage is over those rows rather than over the whole market. A book that prices 44 passing yards props and wins 93% of them is telling you something real about those 44, not about the other 55. “Too few rows” means under 30 quoted, which we do not report.
DraftKings owns football and bet365 owns baseball. Passing yards 93%. Home runs 0%. Same nineteen books, same night, opposite answers.
If you took “DraftKings has the best prop odds” from a general roundup and you bet home runs, you were taking the worst of it in the market you actually play, on the night we measured.
This table has three columns, which is a limit and not a ranking
Those three books are the three people ask about. They are not the three best.
On home runs, the table above says bet365 at 27%, and bet365 is not the best home run book on this board. Run the same count across all nineteen and a different book wins that market outright, at better than double bet365’s share. We put that one in which sportsbook has the best home run odds rather than bury it here.
That is the general warning, and it applies to anyone else’s comparison too: a three way table can only tell you which of three books was best, and the honest use of one is to answer the question the reader arrived with, not to crown a market winner.
What this ranking deliberately does not do
It does not measure what a book charges. Being the best price most often and charging the least are different questions, and a book can win the first by pricing a narrow slice aggressively. What a prop costs is its own measurement, and we did it separately in how much a player prop actually costs you: the overround ran from 5.4% to 11.4% across the books on that same night.
It is one night, and one night moves. We ran these figures, the board was re-pulled a few hours later before the slate, and several of them shifted: bet365’s overall share, the row counts, the entire home run column. Nothing about the sportsbooks changed. That is why every number on this page carries a date, and why we would rather you treated the shape as the finding than the decimals.
No book was contacted, paid, or asked. There are no affiliate links on this page and no signup pitch. One game was excluded from the board throughout for unrelated reasons.
How to check this yourself tonight
You do not need our board to run this method. Open the same prop at two or three books and compare the prices on the same number. The table above is that, at scale.
If you want tools rather than tabs, we opened twelve of them logged out and wrote down what actually rendered in free player prop tools. Several show multi-book prop comparison without an account, which is the fastest version of this check.
To strip the margin off any price and see what the two sides are really worth, the no vig calculator does it in a few seconds.
And the Lab board is where these numbers came from: every book we track, priced side by side on every prop, for tonight’s slate rather than the one we measured.
Numbers on this page come from our own board for the 12 September 2026 slate. One night, 19 books, 6,376 priced sides.
Quick answers
Which sportsbook has the best player prop odds?
It depends on the sport. On one night of our board, bet365 and ProphetX tied for the best price most often overall at 31.3% each, but DraftKings was best on 93% of passing yards props while being best on zero home run props. No single book is the answer across the board.
Is DraftKings good for player props?
For football props on the night we measured, yes: best price on 93% of passing yards, 71% of rushing yards and 70% of receiving yards. For baseball it was beaten badly, best on 3% of total bases and none of the 147 home run rows it quoted.
Which book is best for MLB props?
Among the three books people usually compare, bet365: best price on 52% of walks, 37% of runs and 35% of singles on the rows it quoted. For home runs specifically the answer is a book outside those three, covered on our home run odds page.
Does a book with more props have better odds?
No, and often the reverse. Fliff quoted 72.0% of the board on that night and had the best price on 1.0% of the rows it quoted. Breadth and price are separate things.
How did you measure best price?
On every row where at least three books were quoting, we took the highest decimal odds. No model and no projection is involved: it is a count of who was highest, across 6,376 priced sides on one night.
Want tonight's board?
The Lab prices every player prop on the slate, shows the form and the matchup behind each line, and posts a short card before first pitch. Every pick is graded in public afterwards, win or lose. It is free and there is nothing to sign up for.